ampliconflow

opens the authoritative record at ENA, SRA or BioSample; this page never replaces it

PRJNA1031540 released 25 Sept 2026

PRJNA1031540

Pipeline 0.1.0 Contract v0.1 Licence CC-BY-4.0

Tags

derived from the release metadata, not hand-written

Study

The study record carries no description, and its registered title is the accession itself. The figures below are computed from the 33 released samples and 32 runs.

Samples
33
Runs
32
Collection
2021-10 to 2022-04

Linked publication

Inhibition profile of three biological nitrification inhibitors and their response to soil pH modification in two contrasting soils.

10.1093/femsec/fiae072 · 2024 · via europepmc

Linked by the enrich stage. Fields taken from the paper: primers, subfragment.

abstract

Up to 70% of the nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied to agricultural soils is lost through microbially mediated processes, such as nitrification. This can be counteracted by synthetic and biological compounds that inhibit nitrification. However, for many biological nitrification inhibitors (BNIs), the interaction with soil properties, nitrifier specificity, and effective concentrations are unclear. Here, we investigated three synthetic nitrification inhibitors (SNIs) (DCD, DMPP, and nitrapyrin) and three BNIs [methyl 3(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate (MHPP), methyl 3(4-hydroxyphenyl) acrylate (MHPA), and limonene] in two agricultural soils differing in pH and nitrifier communities. The efficacies of SNIs and BNIs were resilient to short-term pH changes in the neutral pH soil, whereas the efficacy of some BNIs increased by neutralizing the alkaline soil. Among the BNIs, MHPA showed the highest inhibition and was, together with MHPP, identified as a putative AOB/comammox-selective inhibitor. Additionally, MHPA and limonene effectively inhibited nitrification at concentrations comparable to those used for DCD. Moreover, we identified the effective concentrations at which 50% and 80% of inhibition is observed (EC50 and EC80) for the BNIs, and similar EC80 values were observed in both soils. Overall, our results show that these BNIs could potentially serve as effective alternatives to SNIs currently used.

Linked by the enrich stage from europepmc.

Location

sampling sites from the release coordinates
33sampling sites · drag to pan, scroll or pinch to zoom

Place name hierarchy

  1. ▸ Österreich
  2. › Niederösterreich
  3. › Bezirk Gänserndorf

Districts named on the samples

  • Bezirk Gänserndorf 1

Latitude 48.21589 to 48.21589, longitude 16.61836 to 16.61836. Names resolved with OpenStreetMap Nominatim from the release's own coordinates; Coordinates parsed from the released lat_lon text field, which the pipeline keeps but does not split into latitude/longitude columns.

How the sequences were obtained

sample to release
01 study metadata

Sample collection

33 samples, 2021-10 to 2022-04

48.2159 to 48.2159 N, 16.6184 to 16.6184 E

02 not reported

Storage

not reported

neither the archive nor the linked paper states storage conditions

03 https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38702852

Processing

DNeasy PowerSoil

extraction kit named in the linked paper

04 per-run QC and the linked paper

PCR

16S rRNA V4, primers 806R, U515F, region V3

primers: trimmed

05 not reported

Sequencing preparation

not reported

no library kit or index strategy in the archive or the linked paper

06 study metadata

Sequencing

Illumina MiSeq

32 runs; PAIRED 253.8485 bp reads; the linked paper's text supports MiSeq

07 this release

Denoising

dada2 1.38.0

13,440 ASVs from 524,002 reads

ampliconflow branches off at step 6, Sequencing

this release

ampliconflow starts here: 524,002 reads from 32 runs, QC to 93.0% 16S identity and 91.0% above Q30, primers trimmed, dada2 1.38.0 to 13,440 ASVs, taxonomy against a SINTAX reference, then the release (CC-BY-4.0).

Steps 1 to 6 are how the sequences were obtained, from the study's own archive metadata. Step 7 is what the authors report doing with the sequences in the linked paper. ampliconflow starts at the deposited reads rather than repeating the wet lab.

Taxonomy assigned with SILVA 138.2 (SINTAX).

The linked paper's methods run to 15,146 characters. It supports: extraction_kit, platform, primers, subfragment.

Conflict on sequencing platform: the release has Illumina MiSeq, the linked paper's text supports MiSeq.

33

Samples

32 runs

13.4k

Features

OTUs at 97%

524k

Reads

mapped total

53 MB

Release size

99 files

Depth floor

1,000 reads

no samples below

QC warnings

32

97% of runs warned

Reads per sample

log scale
min
5,859
median
16,173
max
35,368

Feature detection

99.5% non-zero

13,369 / 13,440 features

Features with at least one observed read. The remainder are present in the reference set but not detected in these samples.

Composition

Top phyla

  • Pseudomonadota 83,973 (16.0%)
  • Actinomycetota 76,183 (14.5%)
  • Acidobacteriota 67,645 (12.9%)
  • Thermoproteota 58,440 (11.2%)
  • Bacillota 42,840 (8.2%)
  • Verrucomicrobiota 39,938 (7.6%)
  • Planctomycetota 39,738 (7.6%)
  • Bacteroidota 31,749 (6.1%)
  • Cyanobacteriota 24,873 (4.7%)
  • Chloroflexota 24,483 (4.7%)
  • Myxococcota 13,729 (2.6%)
  • Gemmatimonadota 5,560 (1.1%)
  • Thermodesulfobacteriota 4,516 (0.9%)
  • Nitrospirota 4,440 (0.8%)
  • Latescibacterota 1,246 (0.2%)
  • Armatimonadota 1,244 (0.2%)
  • Methylomirabilota 1,114 (0.2%)
  • Bdellovibrionota 670 (0.1%)
  • Entotheonellaeota 484 (0.1%)
  • NB1-j 357 (0.1%)

Top genera

  • Incertae Sedis 265,748 (50.7%)
  • Candidatus Udaeobacter 16,786 (3.2%)
  • Sphingomonas 13,719 (2.6%)
  • Paenibacillus 10,525 (2.0%)
  • Nocardioides 8,549 (1.6%)
  • Candidatus Nitrososphaera 7,703 (1.5%)
  • Pirellula 7,150 (1.4%)
  • Chthoniobacter 7,115 (1.4%)
  • Mycobacterium 6,869 (1.3%)
  • Niallia 6,803 (1.3%)
  • Peribacillus 6,470 (1.2%)
  • Massilia 6,312 (1.2%)
  • Bryobacter 5,461 (1.0%)
  • Candidatus Solibacter 5,331 (1.0%)
  • Pseudarthrobacter 4,954 (0.9%)
  • Neobacillus 4,923 (0.9%)
  • Gaiella 4,905 (0.9%)
  • Nitrospira 4,436 (0.8%)
  • Bacillus 4,254 (0.8%)
  • Blastococcus 4,241 (0.8%)

Rank-abundance

log-log
1 10 100 1k 1 10 100 16s-v4:ASV_1 · Incertae Sedis: 2367 reads 16s-v4:ASV_2 · Incertae Sedis: 2165 reads 16s-v4:ASV_3 · Incertae Sedis: 1792 reads 16s-v4:ASV_4 · Incertae Sedis: 1700 reads 16s-v4:ASV_5 · Incertae Sedis: 1537 reads 16s-v4:ASV_6 · Incertae Sedis: 1443 reads 16s-v4:ASV_7 · Peribacillus: 1385 reads 16s-v4:ASV_8 · Peribacillus: 1353 reads 16s-v4:ASV_9 · Incertae Sedis: 1319 reads 16s-v4:ASV_10 · Incertae Sedis: 1256 reads 16s-v4:ASV_11 · Incertae Sedis: 1168 reads 16s-v4:ASV_12 · Niallia: 1100 reads 16s-v4:ASV_13 · Incertae Sedis: 1070 reads 16s-v4:ASV_14 · Niallia: 1045 reads 16s-v4:ASV_15 · Incertae Sedis: 1029 reads 16s-v4:ASV_16 · Pseudarthrobacter: 1009 reads 16s-v4:ASV_17 · Pseudarthrobacter: 1006 reads 16s-v4:ASV_18 · Incertae Sedis: 962 reads 16s-v4:ASV_19 · Blastococcus: 941 reads 16s-v4:ASV_20 · Incertae Sedis: 897 reads 16s-v4:ASV_21 · Sphingomonas: 853 reads 16s-v4:ASV_22 · Blastococcus: 850 reads 16s-v4:ASV_23 · Nitrospira: 834 reads 16s-v4:ASV_24 · Candidatus Nitrososphaera: 820 reads 16s-v4:ASV_25 · Sphingomonas: 813 reads 16s-v4:ASV_26 · Candidatus Nitrososphaera: 807 reads 16s-v4:ASV_27 · Sphingomonas: 786 reads 16s-v4:ASV_28 · Incertae Sedis: 785 reads 16s-v4:ASV_29 · Sphingomonas: 769 reads 16s-v4:ASV_30 · Incertae Sedis: 761 reads 16s-v4:ASV_31 · Incertae Sedis: 726 reads 16s-v4:ASV_32 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 673 reads 16s-v4:ASV_33 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 669 reads 16s-v4:ASV_34 · Neobacillus: 668 reads 16s-v4:ASV_35 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 661 reads 16s-v4:ASV_36 · Candidatus Nitrososphaera: 656 reads 16s-v4:ASV_37 · Candidatus Nitrososphaera: 630 reads 16s-v4:ASV_38 · Niallia: 623 reads 16s-v4:ASV_39 · Niallia: 622 reads 16s-v4:ASV_40 · Nitrospira: 599 reads 16s-v4:ASV_41 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 591 reads 16s-v4:ASV_42 · Incertae Sedis: 588 reads 16s-v4:ASV_43 · Incertae Sedis: 585 reads 16s-v4:ASV_44 · Incertae Sedis: 578 reads 16s-v4:ASV_45 · Incertae Sedis: 573 reads 16s-v4:ASV_46 · Incertae Sedis: 569 reads 16s-v4:ASV_47 · Incertae Sedis: 566 reads 16s-v4:ASV_48 · Sphingomonas: 565 reads 16s-v4:ASV_49 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 563 reads 16s-v4:ASV_50 · Incertae Sedis: 560 reads 16s-v4:ASV_51 · Bacillus: 559 reads 16s-v4:ASV_52 · Neobacillus: 556 reads 16s-v4:ASV_53 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 551 reads 16s-v4:ASV_54 · Incertae Sedis: 547 reads 16s-v4:ASV_55 · Mycobacterium: 547 reads 16s-v4:ASV_56 · Bacillus: 542 reads 16s-v4:ASV_57 · Paenibacillus: 528 reads 16s-v4:ASV_58 · Massilia: 524 reads 16s-v4:ASV_59 · Sphingomonas: 518 reads 16s-v4:ASV_60 · Incertae Sedis: 513 reads 16s-v4:ASV_61 · Incertae Sedis: 499 reads 16s-v4:ASV_62 · Neobacillus: 497 reads 16s-v4:ASV_63 · Paenibacillus: 491 reads 16s-v4:ASV_64 · Incertae Sedis: 483 reads 16s-v4:ASV_65 · Bradyrhizobium: 461 reads 16s-v4:ASV_66 · Incertae Sedis: 457 reads 16s-v4:ASV_67 · Incertae Sedis: 450 reads 16s-v4:ASV_68 · Neobacillus: 449 reads 16s-v4:ASV_69 · Bradyrhizobium: 444 reads 16s-v4:ASV_70 · Massilia: 443 reads 16s-v4:ASV_71 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 438 reads 16s-v4:ASV_72 · Pseudarthrobacter: 431 reads 16s-v4:ASV_73 · Incertae Sedis: 431 reads 16s-v4:ASV_74 · Incertae Sedis: 429 reads 16s-v4:ASV_75 · Incertae Sedis: 428 reads 16s-v4:ASV_76 · Massilia: 426 reads 16s-v4:ASV_77 · Incertae Sedis: 424 reads 16s-v4:ASV_78 · Peribacillus: 423 reads 16s-v4:ASV_79 · Massilia: 414 reads 16s-v4:ASV_80 · Daejeonella: 414 reads 16s-v4:ASV_81 · Incertae Sedis: 414 reads 16s-v4:ASV_82 · Incertae Sedis: 408 reads 16s-v4:ASV_83 · Incertae Sedis: 408 reads 16s-v4:ASV_84 · Sphingomonas: 405 reads 16s-v4:ASV_85 · Mycobacterium: 400 reads 16s-v4:ASV_86 · Pseudarthrobacter: 398 reads 16s-v4:ASV_87 · Incertae Sedis: 396 reads 16s-v4:ASV_88 · Incertae Sedis: 395 reads 16s-v4:ASV_89 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 391 reads 16s-v4:ASV_90 · Peribacillus: 390 reads 16s-v4:ASV_91 · Hyphomicrobium: 388 reads 16s-v4:ASV_92 · Incertae Sedis: 387 reads 16s-v4:ASV_93 · Incertae Sedis: 387 reads 16s-v4:ASV_94 · Incertae Sedis: 387 reads 16s-v4:ASV_95 · Incertae Sedis: 384 reads 16s-v4:ASV_96 · Incertae Sedis: 384 reads 16s-v4:ASV_97 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 383 reads 16s-v4:ASV_98 · Incertae Sedis: 381 reads 16s-v4:ASV_99 · Bryobacter: 380 reads 16s-v4:ASV_100 · Agromyces: 375 reads 16s-v4:ASV_101 · Incertae Sedis: 373 reads 16s-v4:ASV_102 · Incertae Sedis: 371 reads 16s-v4:ASV_103 · Sphingomonas: 371 reads 16s-v4:ASV_104 · Incertae Sedis: 366 reads 16s-v4:ASV_105 · Incertae Sedis: 364 reads 16s-v4:ASV_106 · Daejeonella: 360 reads 16s-v4:ASV_107 · Incertae Sedis: 358 reads 16s-v4:ASV_108 · Incertae Sedis: 358 reads 16s-v4:ASV_109 · Incertae Sedis: 357 reads 16s-v4:ASV_110 · Steroidobacter: 357 reads 16s-v4:ASV_111 · Incertae Sedis: 356 reads 16s-v4:ASV_112 · Incertae Sedis: 356 reads 16s-v4:ASV_113 · Incertae Sedis: 356 reads 16s-v4:ASV_114 · Incertae Sedis: 355 reads 16s-v4:ASV_115 · Incertae Sedis: 354 reads 16s-v4:ASV_116 · Incertae Sedis: 351 reads 16s-v4:ASV_117 · Bryobacter: 351 reads 16s-v4:ASV_118 · Incertae Sedis: 350 reads 16s-v4:ASV_119 · Incertae Sedis: 350 reads 16s-v4:ASV_120 · Incertae Sedis: 349 reads 16s-v4:ASV_121 · Incertae Sedis: 349 reads 16s-v4:ASV_122 · Incertae Sedis: 348 reads 16s-v4:ASV_123 · Incertae Sedis: 347 reads 16s-v4:ASV_124 · Incertae Sedis: 344 reads 16s-v4:ASV_125 · Acidovorax: 341 reads 16s-v4:ASV_126 · Incertae Sedis: 338 reads 16s-v4:ASV_127 · Incertae Sedis: 338 reads 16s-v4:ASV_128 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 337 reads 16s-v4:ASV_129 · Incertae Sedis: 336 reads 16s-v4:ASV_130 · Incertae Sedis: 336 reads 16s-v4:ASV_131 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 331 reads 16s-v4:ASV_132 · Incertae Sedis: 330 reads 16s-v4:ASV_133 · Incertae Sedis: 329 reads 16s-v4:ASV_134 · Steroidobacter: 328 reads 16s-v4:ASV_135 · Gaiella: 325 reads 16s-v4:ASV_136 · Sphingomonas: 323 reads 16s-v4:ASV_137 · Incertae Sedis: 322 reads 16s-v4:ASV_138 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 321 reads 16s-v4:ASV_139 · Acidovorax: 320 reads 16s-v4:ASV_140 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 320 reads 16s-v4:ASV_141 · Incertae Sedis: 319 reads 16s-v4:ASV_142 · Incertae Sedis: 319 reads 16s-v4:ASV_143 · Pseudolabrys: 318 reads 16s-v4:ASV_144 · Incertae Sedis: 317 reads 16s-v4:ASV_145 · Incertae Sedis: 317 reads 16s-v4:ASV_146 · Incertae Sedis: 315 reads 16s-v4:ASV_147 · Sporosarcina: 314 reads 16s-v4:ASV_148 · Chthoniobacter: 313 reads 16s-v4:ASV_149 · Paenibacillus: 312 reads 16s-v4:ASV_150 · Incertae Sedis: 310 reads 16s-v4:ASV_151 · Incertae Sedis: 310 reads 16s-v4:ASV_152 · Incertae Sedis: 308 reads 16s-v4:ASV_153 · Geomonas: 306 reads 16s-v4:ASV_154 · Incertae Sedis: 304 reads 16s-v4:ASV_155 · Incertae Sedis: 302 reads 16s-v4:ASV_156 · Incertae Sedis: 301 reads 16s-v4:ASV_157 · Incertae Sedis: 301 reads 16s-v4:ASV_158 · Incertae Sedis: 301 reads 16s-v4:ASV_159 · Incertae Sedis: 301 reads 16s-v4:ASV_160 · Bacillus: 301 reads 16s-v4:ASV_161 · Incertae Sedis: 300 reads 16s-v4:ASV_162 · Pseudarthrobacter: 299 reads 16s-v4:ASV_163 · Massilia: 296 reads 16s-v4:ASV_164 · Nocardioides: 296 reads 16s-v4:ASV_165 · Incertae Sedis: 294 reads 16s-v4:ASV_166 · Incertae Sedis: 294 reads 16s-v4:ASV_167 · Agromyces: 292 reads 16s-v4:ASV_168 · Nocardioides: 291 reads 16s-v4:ASV_169 · Incertae Sedis: 289 reads 16s-v4:ASV_170 · Pir4 lineage: 288 reads 16s-v4:ASV_171 · Incertae Sedis: 285 reads 16s-v4:ASV_172 · Incertae Sedis: 285 reads 16s-v4:ASV_173 · Nocardioides: 284 reads 16s-v4:ASV_174 · Gemmata: 282 reads 16s-v4:ASV_175 · Incertae Sedis: 281 reads 16s-v4:ASV_176 · Incertae Sedis: 281 reads 16s-v4:ASV_177 · Incertae Sedis: 280 reads 16s-v4:ASV_178 · Incertae Sedis: 279 reads 16s-v4:ASV_179 · Priestia: 277 reads 16s-v4:ASV_180 · Candidatus Xiphinematobacter: 276 reads 16s-v4:ASV_181 · Acidibacter: 276 reads 16s-v4:ASV_182 · Bacillus: 275 reads 16s-v4:ASV_183 · Massilia: 274 reads 16s-v4:ASV_184 · Nitrospira: 274 reads 16s-v4:ASV_185 · Incertae Sedis: 274 reads 16s-v4:ASV_186 · Bradyrhizobium: 273 reads 16s-v4:ASV_187 · Incertae Sedis: 273 reads 16s-v4:ASV_188 · Incertae Sedis: 272 reads 16s-v4:ASV_189 · Sporosarcina: 271 reads 16s-v4:ASV_190 · Incertae Sedis: 270 reads 16s-v4:ASV_191 · Neobacillus: 270 reads 16s-v4:ASV_192 · Incertae Sedis: 270 reads 16s-v4:ASV_193 · Pseudonocardia: 270 reads 16s-v4:ASV_194 · Incertae Sedis: 269 reads 16s-v4:ASV_195 · Incertae Sedis: 268 reads 16s-v4:ASV_196 · Acidibacter: 268 reads 16s-v4:ASV_197 · Incertae Sedis: 268 reads 16s-v4:ASV_198 · Candidatus Udaeobacter: 268 reads 16s-v4:ASV_199 · Chthoniobacter: 267 reads 16s-v4:ASV_200 · Bacillus: 266 reads rank reads

13,369 ranked features, top 200 shown. A steep drop means a few taxa carry most of the reads.

Per-sample reads

32 samples
min
5,859
median
16,173
max
35,368

Downstream QC and analysis

computed from the released tables

Eleven modules, computed from the released count table, the sample metadata and the per-run QC reports. Each panel states its own n and the test it used; a module that cannot run on this release is shown as a flagged gap rather than an empty frame.

Rarefaction

median with p10 to p90
2k 5k 10k 20k 976 0

Expected richness when 32 samples are subsampled to a common depth, resampled 31 draws. Median 598 features observed at full depth.

Depth against richness

log depth
1,020 0 reads per sample, log scale

One point per sample. Correlation of log reads with observed features is 0.676, so the depth floor is doing most of the work of deciding how many features a sample shows.

Per-run QC

  • 16S identity 93.0% alignment call per run
  • Q30 rate 91.0% mean Q 35.8
  • Amplicon V4 primers trimmed
  • PhiX 0.0% control spike-in

32 run report(s), n/a GC, 0.0% ambiguous bases.

Diversity

Shannon
5.96
Simpson
0.996
Evenness
0.938
Chao1
603

Median across samples. Observed richness ranges 0 to 1,020.

Feature prevalence

0 of 13,440 features

present in at least half of the 33 samples (0.0%). 11,005 features appear in one sample only, which is the long tail rarefaction is fighting.

Ordination

pc1 pc2

One point per sample, 33 plotted. Choose the axes and the colour variable; hover a point for its sample id. The legend below the axes names the levels or the numeric range.

What explains each axis

pc1 · 16.8%

  • evenness 14.3%
  • chao1 2.2%
  • shannon 2.0%
  • observed 0.7%

pc2 · 12.0%

  • evenness 7.3%
  • year 5.2%
  • chao1 2.7%
  • shannon 1.4%

pc3 · 6.7%

  • pH 4.2%
  • observed 3.5%
  • reads 3.3%
  • chao1 2.7%

Categorical variables use eta-squared (between-group share of the axis), numeric ones the squared Pearson correlation. Computed from the released sample metadata.

Alpha diversity per sample

Shannon
6.5 32 samples

Median Shannon 5.961 across the release; observed richness runs 0 to 1020.

Bray-Curtis dissimilarity

33 x 33, darker is closer

Sample order is the release order, 33 labels, and the matrix itself ships as beta_distance.tsv beside the analysis.

Phylogenetic diversity

Not available for this release: no Newick tree beside the table; run the tree stage, then re-run analyze. The legacy analysis computed Faith's PD when the container carried a tree, and this one reports the absence instead of an empty column.

Community states

CLR, k by silhouette

k = 4 silhouette 0.583

  • state 0 3 samples
  • state 1 16 samples
  • state 2 8 samples
  • state 3 6 samples

Clustered on the centred log-ratio of the top 200 features; 33 samples.

Batch-bias audit

states against

adjusted Rand 0.0289 p = 0.2630

no strong evidence that the states are the batch

999 permutations. Every sample here carries both MiSeq and MiniSeq runs, so the batch variable used is the one with two levels, here .

Variance partitioning

mean R2 per feature, CLR
  • year 0.018

Joint R2 0.018, so the metadata explains a modest slice of the feature variation, and the two variables are not independent of one another.

Effect size

Shannon diversity between 2021 (n=16) and 2022 (n=16)

Cohen's d
2.346 (large)
Cliff's delta
0.938
log2 fold change
0.131

Means n/a and n/a. The difference is small and the spread is wide, which is what the delta says too.

Taxa against year

kruskal with bh

200 features tested, 0 survive the correction at q ≤ 0.05

Nothing survives. The smallest q is 1.000, which is the honest answer for a study whose samples are spread across three years with two to thirteen samples per year.

  • 16s-v4:ASV_1 H 0.06 · p 0.811 · q 1.000
  • 16s-v4:ASV_2 H 0.08 · p 0.774 · q 1.000
  • 16s-v4:ASV_3 H 0.01 · p 0.924 · q 1.000
  • 16s-v4:ASV_4 H 0.02 · p 0.886 · q 1.000
  • 16s-v4:ASV_5 H 0.05 · p 0.830 · q 1.000

Group difference and spread

Bray-Curtis, 999 permutations
PERMANOVA pseudo-F
1.002 · p 0.397
PERMDISP F
2.15 · p 0.445
Distance decay (Mantel r)
n/a · p n/a
  • 202116
  • 202217

The contamination class separates the communities beyond the spread within each class (PERMANOVA) with no evidence that the spread itself differs (PERMDISP). Distance decay runs over n/a to n/a km.

Spatial structure

observed richness over distance

the study's coordinates fall on a single site (no spread), so spatial autocorrelation is not defined

Constrained ordination

contamination class as the constraint

RDA · R2 0.029p 0.540

Hellinger-scaled, 1 dummy predictors over 33 samples. The constraint explains 2.9% of the community inertia, -0.003 adjusted.

CCA · p 0.899

Chi-square weighted SVD. Not significant here, which is the honest reading at this sample size and predictor count.

Co-occurrence network

100 nodes · 3,564 edges

positive
3,564
negative
0
density
0.720
components
1
mean degree
71.3

Spearman on log1p proportions, 100 features, |r| ≥ 0.50, FDR 0.05.

Hubs by degree

    Differential abundance

    wilcoxon · bh

    13,369 features tested, 0 survive q ≤ 0.05

    2021 against 2022, {"2021":17,"2022":16}. Nothing separates the two classes after correction, so the contamination signal is a community-level shift rather than a handful of marker taxa.

    • 16s-v4:ASV_1000p 0.090 · q 0.406 · log2FC 2.72
    • 16s-v4:ASV_10000p 0.332 · q 0.406 · log2FC -0.70
    • 16s-v4:ASV_10001p 0.332 · q 0.406 · log2FC -0.70
    • 16s-v4:ASV_10002p 0.332 · q 0.406 · log2FC -0.70
    • 16s-v4:ASV_10003p 0.332 · q 0.406 · log2FC -0.70
    • 16s-v4:ASV_10004p 0.332 · q 0.406 · log2FC -0.70

    R-backed alternatives kept external: ancombc, deseq2, aldex2, linda, corncob.

    Feature ranking and power

    by mean
    • 16s-v4:ASV_1mean 71.73
    • 16s-v4:ASV_2mean 65.61
    • 16s-v4:ASV_3mean 54.30
    • 16s-v4:ASV_4mean 51.52
    • 16s-v4:ASV_5mean 46.58
    • 16s-v4:ASV_6mean 43.73
    • 16s-v4:ASV_7mean 41.97
    • 16s-v4:ASV_8mean 41.00

    Power: 3 samples per group for 2.35 SD at 0.8 power, alpha 0.05. The study was sufficiently sized for a moderate effect; the effect it actually found is small.

    Phylogenetic and signal analyses need a tree

    no Newick tree beside the table; run the tree stage, then re-run analyze. The tree stage aligns the ASVs with MAFFT and builds with FastTree, both detected as external tools; neither is installed on the machine this page was built on, so Faith's PD, UniFrac, Pagel's lambda and Blomberg's K are left flagged rather than guessed.

    Similar studies

    composition, metadata, location, shared authors

    Ranked from the released tables: genus composition as Bray-Curtis similarity, shared environment and method terms, the distance between sample centroids, and authors shared with the linked publication.

    Missing or wrong data?

    Report a field that is empty or mistaken, or associate a paper with this study. No account is needed; the contact email is optional and used only to reply about this submission.

    Contribute to PRJNA1031540

    Validated automatically where it can be, reviewed by a person where it cannot.

    Downloads

    11 files · sha256 in manifest

    Files are served from https://huggingface.co/datasets/hmacgregor/ampliconflow-releases/resolve/main/PRJNA1031540-20260926/ once hosting is wired. Until then the links point at a placeholder base URL.

    Samples

    33 samples
    Sample Collected year Reads Features Shannon State
    SAMN38046997 2022-04 11,318 488 5.891 3
    SAMN38046998 2022-04 9,483 402 5.628 3
    SAMN38046999 2022-04 5,859 282 5.316 0
    SAMN38047000 2022-04 15,837 598 5.929 1
    SAMN38047001 2022-04 7,838 357 5.517 3
    SAMN38047002 2022-04 6,844 322 5.476 1
    SAMN38047003 2022-04 7,340 290 5.153 1
    SAMN38047004 2022-04 10,768 420 5.634 2
    SAMN38047005 2022-04 11,533 464 5.734 2
    SAMN38047006 2022-04 10,026 410 5.599 2
    SAMN38047007 2022-04 15,771 607 6 1
    SAMN38047008 2022-04 13,360 538 5.862 1
    SAMN38047009 2022-04 7,334 340 5.51 1
    SAMN38047010 2022-04 10,305 423 5.689 1
    SAMN38047011 2022-04 8,758 378 5.621 3
    SAMN38047012 2022-04 18,778 662 5.993 2
    SAMN38049510 2021-10 18,703 644 6.025 1
    SAMN38049511 2021-10 19,274 673 6.084 1
    SAMN38049512 2021-10 25,201 834 6.383 1
    SAMN38049513 2021-10 17,893 651 6.142 3
    SAMN38049514 2021-10 29,645 975 6.52 1
    SAMN38049515 2021-10 22,030 770 6.301 0
    SAMN38049516 2021-10 24,791 828 6.38 1
    SAMN38049517 2021-10 17,556 640 6.133 1
    SAMN38049518 2021-10 0 0 1
    SAMN38049519 2021-10 24,766 798 6.237 1
    SAMN38049520 2021-10 19,036 632 6.012 2
    SAMN38049521 2021-10 13,580 501 5.798 2
    SAMN38049522 2021-10 16,510 565 5.904 2
    SAMN38049523 2021-10 19,990 691 6.116 1
    SAMN38049524 2021-10 20,403 679 6.109 2
    SAMN38049525 2021-10 28,104 927 6.46 0
    SAMN38049526 2021-10 35,368 1,020 6.536 3

    click a column head to sort